The news is replete today with the Me-Too movement
against the widespread prevalence of sexual assault and
harassment, especially in the workplace.
When can an
employer be liable for acts of sexual
assault and harassment by one of its employees?
Vicarious liability is a legal doctrine that assigns liability for an injury to a person who did not cause the injury but who has a legal relationship to the person who did act negligently.
Common law
In PE v Ikwezi Municipality and others
2016 (5) SA 114 (ECG) the court had to consider sexual harassment in the
workplace, which gave rise to the plaintiff’s Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. She
instituted a claim against the perpetrator and the employer for damages in
excess of R4 million.
The question before the court in this matter is like
the question in Grobler v Naspers Bpk
en n Ander 2004 4 SA 221 (C):
“[Is] the unlawful act sufficiently connected to
the conduct authorised by the employer to justify the imposition of vicariously
liability? The existence of a significant relationship between the creation or
increase in the risk of the commission of the unlawful act and resultant wrong
indicated a sufficient relationship for imposition of vicarious liability.
Relevant factors were the opportunity presented to the harasser to abuse his
authority, the ambit of his authority and the vulnerability of the potential
victim to the abuse therefor.”
The court held that the Ikwezi Municipality placed
the perpetrator in the position where he was able to act the way he did.
Therefore, the employment relationship facilitated his actions. The implicit
trust in the collegial relationship “forged a causal link” between the
perpetrator’s position as a Corporate Services Manager and the wrongful
behaviour. Ultimately the court held the Municipality vicariously liable for
the sexual harassment by its employee.
The Employment Equity Act (the EEA)
In addition to the common law, employees may have
an alternative remedy against the employer in terms of s60 of the EEA. In terms
of subsection 2, an employer must take all reasonable steps to eliminate
contravention of the Act, which includes sexual harassment. Failure by the
employer to take such reasonable steps, will render the employer liable for the
conduct of the employee in that the employer will be deemed to have committed
the wrongful conduct. The Labour Appeal Court has awarded damages in the amount
of R250 000 to an employee who was a victim of sexual harassment. Liberty Group Limited v Margaret Masango
(Case no: 105/2015)
To avoid vicarious liability, employers need to be
proactive and put into place and strictly enforce a Code of Good Practice on
the Handling of Sexual Harassment. More importantly, they need to train staff on
sexual harassment in the workplace and put measures in place which provide
employees with an effective channel of reporting sexual harassment in the
workplace.