Our Services

Our Services

February 26, 2021

Can an employee be fired for refusing to be vaccinated?


Countless South Africans are anxiously awaiting their chance to get vaccinated against the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). However, in many countries, some people have refused to be inoculated.

Our President made it clear that this is a voluntary vaccine.

While no firm regulations are in place around international and interstate travel, some countries may require travellers to have a Covid vaccination passport. In time, pubs and restaurants could also refuse entry to people who refuse to get vaccinated.

Can your current (or prospective) employer force you to be vaccinated as the government eases pandemic restrictions and we go back to work? Can a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination be required as a condition of employment? Can an employee be dismissed for refusing to be vaccinated?

The law is unclear.  Until our courts rule on a case-by-case basis, employers should be wary of making a jab compulsory and dismissing an employee who refuses the vaccination.

Our courts will balance employees' rights between our Constitution (that gives citizens the right to privacy or bodily integrity) and compliance with health and safety protocols. The applicable laws are the Disaster Management Act, the Occupational Health and Safety Act, the Mine Health and Safety Act, and other legislation pieces, including the Labour Relations Act (the LRA).

Section 187(1)(f) of the LRA makes a dismissal automatically unfair if an employer unfairly discriminates against an employee on grounds such as age, religion, conscience, and belief as well as "any other arbitrary ground". Time will tell if an employer can fairly dismiss an employee who refuses the vaccination on religious or similar grounds.

Employers should create a Covid vaccination policy that may be mandatory or flexible, depending on the workplace health risks.

The ultimate test will be if the mandatory vaccination policy was fair and reasonable in the circumstances of each case. If it was, an employee's refusal to be inoculated might be a ground for dismissal.


February 22, 2021

Can I refuse to go to work during the lockdown?

The Covid-19 pandemic has sown fear and confusion. People have lost their jobs and others are scared to go to work and be with co-workers.

Can an employee reasonably refuse to work in an office or workplace? In the recent CCMA case of Botha v TVR Distribution, the CCMA found that if an employer issues a lawful and reasonable instruction, even during a pandemic, the employee is obliged to obey it and could face dismissal for failure to comply.

The commissioner had to decide on the fairness of Botha’s dismissal on the grounds of gross insubordination and insolence after refusing to attend work during the Covid-19 lockdown.

Botha’s employer had the required CIPC certificate to allow it to operate as an essential service during the lockdown. The employer ordered Botha to go to work but he refused, because he had not been provided personal protective equipment, that he had not been given a permit, and that the level 5 lockdown regulations did not permit him to work and he refused to break the law.

After hearing the evidence, the commissioner found that the dismissal was substantively fair but procedurally unfair. The commissioner found that the company had complied with all the disaster management health and other regulations to protect Botha, but he simply had no intention to attend work.

Regarding the evidence, various authors, and the Labour Relations Act (especially Schedule 8 Code of Good Practice: Dismissal) the commissioner found that an employee’s lack of respect renders the employment relationship intolerable and disobedience undermines the employer’s authority; that Botha’s refusal to report for duty amounted to a failure to obey a lawful and reasonable instruction, he was insolent and insubordinate in doing so, and that his dismissal was therefore substantively fair.

The commissioner further ruled that as that the chairperson at Botha’s disciplinary hearing seemed to have prejudged the case and failed to allow Botha to provide mitigating factors for his conduct, the dismissal was not procedurally fair. Accordingly, the employer was ordered to pay one month’s salary to Botha as compensation.