Uncontested Divorce in South Africa and Mediation: A Simple Guide for Couples

Written by Roy Bregman, an admitted attorney with over 51 years’ experience in South African family and divorce law.

Divorce can be a challenging and emotional process. In South Africa, the legal system provides a structured approach to ensure fairness and clarity. An uncontested divorce is one where both parties agree on all terms, making it a quicker and less stressful option. This guide will simplify the process of obtaining an uncontested divorce in South Africa and explain why mediation is beneficial if there are any sticking points.

Key Takeaways

• An uncontested divorce is where both spouses agree on everything, making the process faster, cheaper, and less stressful.
• Mediation is strongly encouraged by the court rules, but you cannot be forced to sit with a mediator or to reach agreement.
• Rule 41A requires both sides to state in writing at the start of the case whether they are willing to mediate, even though mediation itself is still voluntary.
• Mediation helps couples sort out children’s issues, maintenance, and assets in a calmer, child‑focused way and often leads to a smoother uncontested divorce

What Is an Uncontested Divorce?

An uncontested divorce is when both spouses agree on all the important issues: who gets what, what happens with the children, and who pays maintenance. Because there is no fight about the terms, the court process is shorter, more predictable, and cheaper than a contested divorce where a judge must decide.

In South Africa, a court still has to grant the divorce and approve any settlement agreement, especially where children are involved, to ensure it is lawful and in the children’s best interests.

Legal Principles and Rule 41A Mediation Duty

South African divorce law is built on the idea that a marriage can be ended if it has broken down irretrievably and there is no real chance of reconciliation. At the same time, the Constitution, the Children’s Act and the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act require courts and parents to put children’s best interests first.

Rule 41A of the High Court and Uniform Rules of Court introduced a specific duty to consider mediation at the start of any civil case, including divorces. Each party must file a written notice stating whether they agree to or oppose mediation, but the rule does not force anyone to actually mediate or to reach agreement. Courts increasingly look at whether a party refused mediation unreasonably when deciding who must pay legal costs.

Is Mediation Mandatory or Just Recommended?

Mediation is recommended and encouraged, but it is not compulsory in ordinary divorce cases. You cannot be ordered to reach a settlement, and you cannot be punished just because you did not want to mediate, although a completely unreasonable refusal might count against you when costs are argued.

What is compulsory is the paperwork:

• The spouse issuing summons must file a Rule 41A notice saying whether they agree to mediation.
• The defending spouse must file their own notice when they deliver their plea.

In some divisions, especially Gauteng, practice directives are moving towards more structured or even mandatory mediation for certain civil cases, but the general position remains that mediation in divorce is a voluntary process in substance.

Why Mediation Makes Uncontested Divorce Easier

Mediation is a guided conversation where a neutral mediator helps both spouses talk through disputes and find common ground. The mediator does not take sides and does not decide for you; the couple remains in control of the outcome.

Key benefits include:

• Lower cost: Mediation is usually much cheaper than preparing for a contested trial.
• Faster outcome: A series of mediation sessions can lead to a full settlement far quicker than waiting for overloaded court dates.
• Less emotional damage: The process is more cooperative and can reduce conflict, which is especially important where the couple must co‑parent after the divorce.
• Child‑focused solutions: Mediators and Family Advocates are trained to help parents craft parenting plans that truly serve their children’s interests.
• More control and flexibility: You can agree on creative, practical solutions that a court might not order in a standard judgment.

When mediation succeeds, the result is a detailed settlement agreement that can be taken to court as the basis for an uncontested divorce, saving time, money and stress

Step‑by‑Step: How an Uncontested Divorce Works

1. Agree on the Settlement

The first and most important step is for the spouses to agree on the terms of the divorce. This usually covers:

·       How property, money and debts will be divided.

• Where the children will live, how contact will work, and who will have guardianship.
• Maintenance for children and, if applicable, for a spouse.

These terms are written into a settlement agreement. Once both parties sign, it becomes a binding contract, subject to the court’s approval.

2. Draft and Issue the Divorce Summons

A divorce summons must then be drafted and issued out of either the High Court or the Regional Court that has jurisdiction over your matter. The summons normally attaches the signed settlement agreement and sets out brief details of the breakdown of the marriage.

3. Sheriff Serves the Summons

The summons is personally served on the defendant by the sheriff. This is to make sure the other spouse is formally notified and given a fair chance to respond, even in an uncontested matter.

4. Prepare for the Hearing

Your attorney will then prepare the necessary documents for court. Where minor or dependent children are involved, the settlement agreement and any parenting plan must be submitted to the Family Advocate for endorsement to confirm that the arrangements are in the children’s best interests.

5. Attend the Hearing and Get the Decree

In an uncontested divorce, only one spouse (usually the plaintiff) needs to appear in court to give brief evidence that the marriage has broken down and to confirm the settlement agreement. If the judge or magistrate is satisfied that everything is in order and fair, they grant a decree of divorce and make the settlement agreement an order of court.

Conclusion

Obtaining an uncontested divorce in South Africa is a straightforward process if both parties agree on the terms. By following the steps outlined above, couples can navigate the legal system efficiently. Mediation is a valuable tool for resolving any disputes that may arise, offering a cost-effective, faster, and less stressful alternative to traditional divorce proceedings. By prioritizing the well-being of all involved, especially children, mediation helps ensure a smoother transition for everyone.

FAQs

How long does an uncontested divorce take in South Africa?

If all paperwork is in order and both spouses fully cooperate, an uncontested divorce can often be finalised in a few weeks to a few months, depending on the court’s workload and available dates. Delays usually arise when documents are incomplete, the settlement agreement needs changes, or there are children and the papers must first go via the Family Advocate. As a rule of thumb, the smoother your agreement and documentation, the faster the court can grant the divorce decree. Always ask your attorney for a realistic timeline based on the specific court where your case will be heard.

Can we use one lawyer for an uncontested divorce?

In an uncontested divorce, it is common for one attorney to draft the settlement agreement and issue the summons where both spouses are on the same page. Technically the attorney represents the spouse who instructs them, but the other spouse often consents to the terms and signs without needing their own lawyer. However, if the other spouse feels unsure, pressured, or wants independent advice on their rights, they should consult their own attorney before signing. A truly uncontested divorce depends on both parties feeling informed and comfortable with the agreement.

What happens if we start uncontested but later disagree?

If you start the process as an uncontested divorce but new disagreements arise, the matter can shift to a semi‑contested or fully contested case. This usually means more correspondence between lawyers, possible mediation, and, if you still cannot agree, a judge may eventually have to decide the unresolved issues. It does not invalidate the steps already taken, but it can extend the timeline and increase costs. Where possible, using mediation early can often rescue an almost‑uncontested matter and bring it back on track.

Do we still need the Family Advocate if we agree about the children?

Yes, when there are minor or dependent children, the court must be satisfied that the arrangements are in the children’s best interests, even if both parents agree. The Family Advocate may need to consider or endorse your settlement agreement or parenting plan before the court will make it an order. This is a safeguard to protect children and ensure issues like primary residence, contact and maintenance are properly addressed. Your attorney will guide you on when and how the Family Advocate becomes involved in your specific case.

What if my spouse refuses mediation?

Your spouse cannot be forced to mediate, but both sides are expected to at least consider mediation seriously at the start of the case. A flat refusal does not stop the divorce from going ahead, but it may be raised later when a court looks at whether either party acted unreasonably about costs. If your spouse refuses, you can still proceed with the normal court process and try to keep the matter as focused and cooperative as possible. It may also be worth suggesting mediation again later, once emotions have cooled and both parties better understand the time and cost of a contested divorce.

If you and your spouse are considering an uncontested divorce or want to explore mediation first, contact Bregman Moodley Attorneys today. Our team can guide you through each step, help you protect your children’s best interests, and work with you to finalise your divorce as quickly and painlessly as possible.

How to Stop Noisy Neighbours in South Africa – Legal Rights & Remedies Explained

 

Living next to people who play loud music, host constant parties, or allow dogs to bark for hours can destroy your peace, affect your sleep, and harm your health. South African law gives you strong rights to a quiet, peaceful home – and practical remedies if your neighbour refuses to cooperate.​

What Counts as “Noise Nuisance”?

South African law distinguishes between:

• Disturbing noise: Noise that can be measured in decibels, such as loud music, machinery, or power tools.
• Noise nuisance: Ongoing noise that unreasonably disturbs the comfort, peace, or convenience of others, such as constant dog barking, repeated loud parties, shouting, revving engines, or noisy business activities in a residential area.​

If the noise is frequent, persistent, and unreasonable in your area and at that time of day, it may be a noise nuisance, even if it is not measured with a sound meter.​

The Law Is on Your Side

Your right to a peaceful home is protected by:

• Section 24 of the Constitution, which gives everyone the right to an environment that is not harmful to their health or wellbeing.
• The Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989, which regulates noise control nationally.
• Municipal noise by-laws, which give municipalities power to investigate, fine, and act against people who cause unlawful noise.

Municipal officials can investigate complaints, issue abatement notices, impose fines, and even seize equipment or remove animals that cause ongoing noise nuisance.​

What the Courts Have Said

South African courts take noise nuisance seriously and are willing to step in where neighbours or businesses refuse to act.

Some important examples include:

• A theatre-restaurant ordered to stop operating until proper soundproofing was installed because loud music disturbed nearby residents.
• A dog business effectively shut down because constant barking breached noise regulations and amounted to a nuisance.
• Courts confirming that noise nuisance is actionable, and that affected residents can claim an interdict and, in some cases, damages. Courts have also reaffirmed a key principle of neighbour law: you may not use your property in a way that materially interferes with your neighbours’ peace, comfort, or convenience.

Step-by-Step: How to Deal with Noisy Neighbours

1. Talk to your neighbour
• Start with a calm, polite conversation and explain how the noise affects you and your family.
• Sometimes people are unaware of the impact and will correct the problem once it is pointed out.
2. Keep a record
• Note dates, times, type of noise, and how long it continues.
• Save messages, emails, or recordings where appropriate; these can help support your complaint later.
3. Lodge a municipal complaint
• If talking does not help, contact your local municipality’s noise control, law enforcement, or environmental health department.
• Municipalities can investigate without notice, issue written orders to stop the noise, impose fines or criminal penalties, and even confiscate equipment or impound animals in serious cases.
4. Approach the High Court if necessary
• If the noise continues despite warnings and municipal action, you can apply to the High Court for:
• An interdict to stop the noise.
• Damages if you have suffered loss or harm.
• Urgent relief in severe cases where your health, safety, or dignity are affected.

Courts regularly grant orders to stop ongoing noise, and in serious cases have closed or restricted businesses that refuse to respect neighbours’ rights.​

FAQs: Common Questions About Noise Nuisance

• Are there fixed noise limits?
  Each municipality sets its own limits, often with stricter rules at night than during the day.
• Is barking considered noise nuisance?
  Yes – persistent barking that interferes with neighbours’ comfort can be unlawful.
• Can the municipality inspect without warning?
  In most areas, by-laws allow officials to investigate suspected noise nuisance without prior notice.
• Can I get an urgent interdict?
  Yes, especially if the noise is harming your health, wellbeing, or safety.
• Can a court force a business to close?
  Yes. South African courts have closed or restricted businesses where noise nuisance continues despite complaints and enforcement.

 You Don’t Have to Suffer in Silence

Unreasonable, ongoing noise is not something you simply have to “put up with”. The law gives you clear remedies – from friendly discussion to municipal enforcement, to High Court interdicts where necessary.

If noisy neighbours or a nearby business are disrupting your peace, affecting your sleep, or harming your health, consider getting legal advice about your options and the best strategy for your situation.

 

Does the Consumer Protection Act Apply to Private Residential Leases? Els v Venter Explained

 

Written by Roy Bregman, admitted attorney with over 51 years’ experience in consumer, property and housing law.

Does the Consumer Protection Act Apply to My Residential Lease?

The case of Els v Venter and Another (SCA 2025) considered whether the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) applies to once-off, private residential lease agreements and the procedural requirements for eviction under South African law.

Key Takeaways

The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) had to consider whether a residential lease of a family home, concluded as a temporary arrangement by private owners, falls within the ambit of the CPA, and how this interacts with eviction protections under the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 (PIE). 

If a private owner leases out a property on a once-off basis and is not in the business of leasing, the CPA does not regulate the agreement or provide the tenant with additional protections regarding lease duration or termination. 

Contractual termination clauses in private leases are enforceable.

Even where termination of a lease is contractually valid, a landlord cannot obtain an eviction order without complying with the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act (PIE).

The judgment draws a clear boundary: the CPA regulates commercial leasing activity, while private residential leases remain governed by contract law, with evictions strictly controlled by PIE.​

What Did the Court Decide in Els v Venter?

The SCA delivered judgment in an appeal from the Western Cape High Court. The appeal was mostly dismissed, except that the High Court’s order forcing the tenant (Mr Johann Els) to vacate the property was set aside.

Facts of the case

The parties were private individuals: The Venters, after moving to Australia, leased their family home to Els on a renewed residential agreement with a clause permitting termination on three months’ written notice if the owners decided to sell.

The dispute arose when the Venters exercised the termination clause to sell the property. Els claimed CPA protections as a tenant under a fixed-term lease arguing the principle huur gaat voor koop (a lease survives a sale).

High Court Decision

The High Court agreed with the owners, held the CPA did not apply, and ordered Els to vacate. Els appealed.

Summary of the SCA Judgment

The SCA was asked to decide if such a lease was a fixed-term “consumer agreement” in the “ordinary course of business” and whether an order compelling the tenant to vacate was permissible without following PIE.

At the heart of the case lay three key issues: the statutory meaning of “transaction” and “rental” under the CPA; the scope of section 14 on fixed-term agreements; and the limits on granting eviction-type relief without compliance with PIE’s just and equitable process. The SCA’s answer draws an important line between commercial rental activity subject to the CPA and private, once-off leasing of a family home pending sale.​

The SCA’s analysis turned on the CPA definitions of “transaction” and “rental”, both of which require that the supplier acts “in the ordinary course of business” and is engaged in the continuing marketing and supply of services. For a lease to qualify as a “rental” under the Act, the lessor must carry on a business of letting property and routinely market rental services to consumers; a single lease for consideration is not enough.

The SCA held that the CPA did not apply to the lease because the Act regulates rental agreements only where the landlord is acting “in the ordinary course of business.” For a lease to qualify as a “rental” or “consumer agreement” under the CPA, the lessor must be engaged in the ongoing business of letting property and must routinely market or supply rental services to consumers.

In this case, the Court found that the owners were not suppliers operating a rental business but private individuals who had let their family home temporarily while arranging its sale. As the lease was a once-off, private arrangement and not part of any business activity, it fell outside the CPA.

Practical Implications for Landlords and Tenants

The judgment in Els v Venter and Another confirms that the CPA regulates commercial leasing by landlords in the business of letting property, not once-off residential leases of a family home concluded as a temporary measure pending sale. Tenants in such private arrangements cannot rely on the CPA’s fixed-term protections to displace clear termination clauses where the Act does not apply.

At the same time, the decision reinforces that even a valid contractual termination does not authorise eviction without compliance with PIE and its just and equitable safeguards. For landlords and tenants alike, the case provides certainty on when the CPA bites and underlines the central role PIE continues to play in protecting occupiers of residential property.

FAQs

Does the CPA always apply to residential leases?

No. The CPA generally applies only where the landlord is in the business of letting property and continually markets rental services, not to once-off private leases of a family home. All 

Can a landlord terminate a fixed-term lease on notice if the CPA does not apply?

Yes, provided the lease contractually allows such termination and there is no other legal bar; section 14 of the CPA cannot be used to override a valid termination clause in a private lease outside the Act. 

If my lease is validly terminated, can the landlord evict me without following PIE?

No. Even after lawful termination, any eviction from residential premises must comply with PIE, and a court must decide whether eviction is just and equitable. 

How do I know if my landlord is acting “in the ordinary course of business”?
Relevant indicators include whether the landlord owns multiple rental properties, advertises rentals to the public, and routinely lets properties for profit, as opposed to a once-off letting of a personal home pending sale or emigration. 

If you are a landlord or tenant facing a dispute about a residential lease, CPA rights or an eviction, you should obtain timely legal advice before acting. Contact Bregman Moodley Attorneys to review your lease, assess whether the CPA or PIE applies, and help you navigate your next steps confidently and lawfully.

Missing Heir in a Deceased Estate? A Guide for South Africa

What happens when an heir to a South African deceased estate is missing? Learn about the executor's duties, the Guardian's Fund, and court applications. Expert legal guidance.

Introduction: What Happens if an Heir is Missing in South Africa?

A client asked: “When winding up the estate of the deceased, how does one deal with the fact that a primary beneficiary has disappeared and, despite best efforts, cannot be found? I am a second-tier heir.”

This is a challenging but not uncommon scenario in deceased estate administration. For residuary heirs and executors alike, South African law provides clear guidance to ensure the protection of missing beneficiaries’ rights and the proper handling of estate funds. This article unpacks the legal principles, statutory requirements, and practical steps for executors and heirs when faced with an untraceable primary beneficiary.

Written by Roy Bregman, an admitted attorney with over 51 years' experience in deceased estates and South African estate law.

Key Takeaways

• If a primary beneficiary in a deceased estate cannot be found despite reasonable tracing efforts, the executor must safeguard that beneficiary's entitlement by paying the unclaimed monies into the Guardians Fund administered by the Master of the High Court.
• These funds remain preserved for the missing beneficiary’s future claim and are not immediately distributed to other heirs.
• Alternative distribution (e.g., vesting funds in a secondary heir) can only occur through a specific court order, such as a declaration of death, supported by substantial evidence.
• Executors must follow statutory procedures (filing accounts, submitting evidence of tracing, and adhering to timelines) to ensure compliance with the Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965.​

Legal Principles: The Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965

What if the primary heir cannot be found?

Under the Administration of Estates Act 66 of 1965, when an executor is unable to distribute estate proceeds to a beneficiary, whether due to the beneficiary being untraceable, missing, or not legally presumed dead, the executor has a statutory obligation to protect those funds.

Key provisions include:

• Section 35(12) – Requires the executor to pay undistributable funds to the Master of the High Court for deposit into the Guardian’s Fund within two months of the estate becoming distributable.
• Section 35(13) – Explicitly covers cases where a beneficiary is an absentee, minor, unknown heir, or person under curatorship, mandating that their share be preserved in the Guardian’s Fund.
• Guardian’s Fund (Administered under the Guardian’s Fund Act 139 of 1989) – Acts as a custodian for funds due to missing or legally incapacitated beneficiaries until they (or their legal representatives) claim them.
• Forfeiture - Once deposited, if the funds remain unclaimed after a period of 30 years from the date they became claimable, they are forfeited to the state. During this time, the Master’s Office periodically publishes lists of unclaimed funds in the Government Gazette in an attempt to find the rightful owners. However, if no successful claim is made within the 30-year timeframe, the funds are permanently transferred to the National Revenue Fund and can no longer be claimed by the heir.

Practical Implications

• No Automatic Forfeiture or Redistribution – The missing beneficiary’s share does not automatically pass to other heirs (e.g., second-tier beneficiaries). The law preserves their entitlement until they are located or legally declared deceased.
• Executor’s Duty – The executor must:
• File a liquidation and distribution account with the Master.
• Provide proof of reasonable tracing efforts (e.g., tracing agency reports, affidavits of attempts to contact).
• Pay the missing beneficiary’s share into the Guardian’s Fund if distribution is impossible.
• Guardian’s Fund Process –
• The funds are invested and held in trust by the state.
• The missing beneficiary (or their heirs) can claim the funds at any time by proving their identity and entitlement.
• Interest may accrue, but administrative fees apply (currently 6% per annum on the capital amount).

Alternatives to the Guardian’s Fund

• When an heir is missing and their inheritance cannot be distributed, the primary legal obligation is to deposit the funds into the Guardian's Fund. The only way to bypass this and have the funds paid to other beneficiaries is through an order from the High Court that declares a missing person declared legally dead.
• The purpose is to convince the court, on a balance of probabilities, that the only reasonable conclusion from the available evidence is that the missing heir has passed away. The court will consider all relevant factors, such as the person's age, health, the circumstances surrounding their disappearance, the length of their absence, and the results of any tracing efforts. A simple lack of contact is often insufficient; there usually needs to be evidence suggesting a perilous situation or other circumstances that make death likely.
• If the court grants the order, the missing heir is considered legally deceased. Their portion of the inheritance can then be distributed to the next entitled beneficiaries (the second-tier heirs) according to the rules of intestate or testate succession.

It is crucial to understand that this is an exceptional legal remedy, and courts do not grant such orders lightly. The application requires substantial and compelling evidence.

What This Means for Your Estate

• If the primary heir remains untraceable and cannot be presumed dead:
• Their share must be paid into the Guardian’s Fund (Johannesburg Master’s Office).
• The second-tier heir (you) cannot claim this portion unless a court orders otherwise.
• If you wish to explore alternatives:
• A High Court application would be required, with strong evidence (e.g., prolonged absence, no financial activity, witness statements).
• Costs and success are not guaranteed—this is a last resort.

Conclusion

When a primary beneficiary in a deceased estate vanishes despite best efforts at tracing, South African law requires executors to safeguard that beneficiary’s entitlement by depositing unclaimed funds into the Guardians Fund. This process protects the absent beneficiary and maintains legal integrity. Only in rare and highly specific circumstances will courts permit alternative distribution.

FAQ Section

What is the Guardians Fund? The Guardians Fund holds estate monies on behalf of beneficiaries who are absent, minors, or legally incapable, preserving their rights for future claims.

Can a residuary heir claim the missing beneficiary’s share? No, unless a court order is obtained—otherwise, the share must be deposited in the Guardians Fund.

How long does the executor have to pay unclaimed funds into the Guardians Fund? Within two months from when the estate becomes distributable.

What evidence is required for the Master’s Office? Executors must provide liquidation and distribution accounts and detailed tracing report evidence proving diligent attempts to locate the missing heir.

Can courts declare a missing beneficiary presumed dead? Yes, but only in exceptional circumstances with substantial supporting evidence.

How do I trace a missing beneficiary in South Africa? To find a missing heir, the person managing an estate starts by checking the deceased's records and contacting family, then searches online and on social media. If those steps fail, they must hire a professional tracing agent to conduct a thorough search and provide a formal report. This process must be carefully documented to prove to the Master of the High Court that every reasonable effort was made before the inheritance is sent to the Guardian's Fund.

What is the time limit to claim from the Guardian's Fund? An heir has 30 years to claim their inheritance from the Guardian's Fund. This countdown starts from the day they were first able to claim it. If the money isn't claimed within this 30-year period, it is lost to the state and can no longer be recovered by the heir. To help find rightful owners, the Master's Office regularly publishes lists of all unclaimed funds in the Government Gazette. 

Struggling with a Missing Heir? Get Expert Legal Help Now.

Navigating a deceased estate is complex, especially with an untraceable beneficiary. Our experienced attorneys provide the clarity and solutions you need.

Schedule Your Confidential Consultation With Roy Bregman Today

 

What Happens to Disability Pension Benefits When You Reach Retirement Age in South Africa?

 

Written by Roy Bregman, an admitted attorney with over 51 years’ experience in South African pension and disability law. 

---

Key Takeaways

• Disability pensions usually stop at retirement age: Your fund will no longer pay disability benefits once you reach the normal retirement age; you’ll begin drawing your standard retirement benefits instead.
• Legal foundations: How retirement fund rules and South African law distinguish between disability and retirement benefits.
• Fund-specific differences: Rules may vary between pension funds. Always confirm details with your fund administrator.
• What to do: If you’re facing retirement with a current disability pension, request written confirmation from your fund about your precise benefits and entitlements.

---

Introduction: Understanding the Legal Principles

Pension and provident funds in South Africa offer vital protection for members who are unable to work due to permanent disability. These funds are regulated by both the Income Tax Act and the Pension Funds Act, which set clear standards for benefit payments and fund rules. When a member becomes disabled, the fund may pay a monthly income or lump sum referred to as a “disability benefit.” However, a common question arises: What happens to these payments when the disabled member reaches the fund’s standard retirement age?​

This article explores the legal principles behind disability and retirement pensions, clarifies what disabled fund members can expect, and offers guidance for beneficiaries and professionals.

---

How Disability Benefits Work

Definition and Purpose

Disability benefits are designed to compensate members who, due to illness or injury, can no longer perform their work, a state typically characterized as permanent disability under fund rules and tax regulations.​ These benefits are paid until one of three things happens:

• The member recovers (unlikely in cases of permanent disability)
• The member passes away
• The member reaches the fund’s retirement age (commonly 65, but sometimes higher)

Legal Authority for Decision-Making

Whether a member qualifies for disability benefits is a legal question guided by the fund’s formal rules. Decisions are often made by the fund trustees, or, in insured funds, by the insurer. These parties must apply definitions from legal and medical reports and act within their discretion as set out in the fund documentation.​

---

The Transition: What Happens at Retirement Age?

End of Disability Pension

Once a disabled member reaches “retirement age,” the fund is legally compelled to cease disability benefit payments. The member now qualifies for the fund’s standard retirement benefits, which are typically paid for the rest of their life. You cannot receive both a disability and a retirement pension at the same time.
This cutoff point reflects compliance with legislation and ensures all members are treated equally under fund rules.

Key Differences Between Disability and Retirement Benefits

Aspect	Disability Pension	Retirement Benefit
Eligibility	Permanent inability to work	Age-based (usually 65+)
Duration	Until retirement age, recovery, or death	For life after retirement age
Payment Type	Monthly income or lump sum	Monthly income or lump sum
Fund’s Role	Review and approve medical/legal reports	Pay-out according to age and fund rules

---

Fund-Specific Rules and Practical Action

While the principle is universal, individual pension funds may have unique administrative and legal rules. Always check your fund’s governing documents and correspond directly with administrators for personalized advice.

If you are or represent a disabled member approaching retirement age, formally request:

• Written information from the fund administrator explaining your transition and future benefit calculations
• Copies of fund rules relating to disability and retirement benefits
• A timeline outlining when changes to payments will take effect

---

Legal Principles in Practice

The key legal distinction is that a disability pension is a form of early retirement. It bridges the gap for permanently disabled members, but is not designed to run indefinitely. Once you become “a pensioner entitled to retirement benefits,” those disability payments are superseded. This approach aligns with South African law’s aims: protecting disabled members while maintaining funds’ compliance and sustainability.​

---

FAQs

Q: Can I get both a disability and retirement pension at the same time?
No. Once you reach your fund’s retirement age, disability benefits stop, and standard retirement benefits start.

Q: What if my fund rules differ from what’s described here?
Speak to the fund administrator and request written confirmation—some differences exist between funds.

Q: Are retirement ages changing in South Africa?
Yes, some proposals suggest raising retirement age from 65 to 67 or 70 for certain funds, but check with your fund directly.

---

Conclusion

South African pension law clearly provides a safety net for disabled members, but it is equally clear that disability pension payments stop when you reach retirement age. At this juncture, you move onto your standard retirement pension, under rules designed to maintain fairness and compliance.

---

If you or someone you know is facing retirement while on disability pension, contact Bregman Moodley Attorneys  for expert advice. Let us help clarify your rights, negotiate with your fund, and secure your financial future.