Until the arrival of the
Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the Act) a defendant could request an incorporated
company as plaintiff in litigation, to put up security for costs (provided that
there was reason to believe that the plaintiff company was unable to pay the
defendant's costs, if successful).
The Act does not provide for
that any longer, so when can a Defendant call for security for costs?
The Supreme Court of Appeal
("SCA") answered that question in Boost
Sports Africa (Pty) Ltd v The South Africa Breweries (Pty) Ltd [2015]
ZASCA 93.
It held that corporate
plaintiffs must be treated the same as natural plaintiffs, and the defendant
can only call for security for costs it can show that an action is vexatious or
reckless. This is a difficult onus to discharge. Our courts have attempted to
define vexatious litigation:
In the words of Holmes JA
in African
Farms & Townships v C.T. Municipality 1963 (2) SA 555 (A)
at 565D-E, "an
action is vexatious and an abuse of the process of Court … if it is obviously
unsustainable". In Golden
International Navigation SA v Zeba Maritime 2008 (3) SA 10 (C)
para 18, Griesel J posited that an action is vexatious and frivolous, "where on the face of the
pleadings it is shown that the action cannot be maintained".
Thus it is possible to call
for security, no longer as a right, but if the Plaintiff’s action is vexatious
or reckless.
No comments:
Post a Comment