Introduction: Understanding Customary Marriages and Polygamy in South Africa
Customary
marriages are an integral part of South African society, reflecting the
traditions and values of many communities. Unlike civil marriages, which are
strictly monogamous, customary marriages may be monogamous or polygamous — meaning
a man can have more than one wife, provided certain legal requirements are met.
The Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, 120 of 1998 (RCMA), was enacted to
protect the rights of all parties in such marriages, especially women, and to
clarify the proprietary (property) consequences of these unions.
This
article explains the legal principles governing customary marriages, discusses
key court cases that have shaped the law, and provides practical guidance for
those entering into polygamous unions.
Legal Principles: The Recognition of Customary Marriages Act
Monogamous
vs. Polygamous Customary Marriages
- Monogamous
Customary Marriage:
If a man marries only one wife under customary law, the marriage is
automatically “in community of property” unless an antenuptial contract
(ANC) is signed beforehand. This means all assets and debts are shared
equally between spouses.
- Polygamous
Customary Marriage:
If a man wishes to marry a second or subsequent wife, he must obtain a
High Court order approving a written contract that sets out how property
will be shared among all wives. This contract protects the proprietary
interests of all spouses.
Requirements for Valid Customary Marriages
To
be valid under South African law, a customary marriage must:
- Be
negotiated and celebrated according to the customs of the relevant
community.
- Involve
parties who are both over 18 years old and capable of consenting.
- Not
be entered into if either party is already married under civil law (civil
marriages are strictly monogamous).
Section 7(6): Protecting Property Rights in Polygamous Marriages
Section
7(6) of the RCMA is crucial for polygamous unions. It requires:
- The
husband to apply to the High Court for approval of a written contract
before marrying another wife.
- The
contract must detail how property will be divided among the husband and
all wives, both current and future.
- The
court will only approve the contract if it is satisfied that the interests
of all spouses are protected.
Case Law: How the Courts Have Interpreted the Law
1. Mayelane
v Ngwenyama and Another [2013] ZACC 14
Facts
Ms
Mayelane married Mr Moyana in 1984 under customary law. In 2008, Ms Ngwenyama
also married Mr Moyana, allegedly without Ms Mayelane’s knowledge or consent.
After Mr Moyana’s death, both women sought recognition of their marriages and
the right to inherit from his estate.
Court’s
Decision
- The
Constitutional Court held that, under Xitsonga customary law, the consent
of the first wife is required for a valid subsequent customary marriage.
- The
Court found that Ms Mayelane’s marriage was valid, but Ms Ngwenyama’s
marriage was invalid because she had not obtained the first wife’s
consent.
- The
Court also clarified that while Section 7(6) does not affect the validity
of the marriage itself, it does determine the property consequences: if
the required contract is not in place, the subsequent marriage is out of
community of property, meaning the new wife does not automatically share
in the joint estate.
Key
Takeaways
- First
wife’s consent is a material requirement for the validity of a subsequent
marriage in some customary law systems.
- Section
7(6) protects the property rights of all wives, but non-compliance does
not necessarily invalidate the marriage; it affects property sharing.
2. Molokane
v Williams and Others [2023] ZAGPJHC 1225
Facts
This
case involved two women, both claiming to be the customary wives of the
deceased. The first marriage was properly concluded under customary law. The
second marriage took place without a court-approved property contract as
required by Section 7(6).
Court’s
Decision
- The
court confirmed that both marriages were valid under customary law.
- However,
because the husband had not complied with Section 7(6), the second
marriage was deemed to be out of community of property.
- The
first wife retained her 50% share of the joint estate, and the second wife
could not claim a share in the joint assets.
Key
Takeaways
- Court
approval of a property contract is mandatory before entering a further
customary marriage.
- Failure
to comply means the second marriage is out of community of property,
protecting the first wife’s interests.
Conclusion: Practical Implications and Guidance
Customary
marriages, especially polygamous ones, are legally recognised in South Africa
but come with complex legal requirements. The RCMA and recent court decisions
aim to protect the rights of all spouses, particularly women, by ensuring that
property is fairly divided, and that no wife is disadvantaged when a husband
takes another wife.
Practical
Steps for Compliance
If
you are considering entering into a polygamous customary marriage:
- Obtain
Consent:
Ensure the consent of the existing wife or wives, as required by customary
law and recent court rulings.
- Draft
a Property Contract:
Prepare a detailed written agreement specifying how property will be
shared among all spouses.
- Apply
to the High Court:
Secure court approval of the contract before marrying another wife.
- Register
the Marriage:
Register all customary marriages with the Department of Home Affairs to
avoid disputes.
Information
to Include in the Property Contract
- Full
names and ID numbers of all parties.
- List
of current assets and liabilities.
- How
property will be divided during the marriage and upon divorce or death.
- Maintenance
and inheritance arrangements.
- Consent
of all existing wives.
Why
Compliance Matters
- Protects
the rights and interests of all wives and children.
- Prevents
future legal disputes over property and inheritance.
- Ensures
that all marriages are legally recognised and enforceable.
Customary
marriages are a living part of South African law. By following the correct
legal steps, all parties can ensure their rights are protected and avoid costly
disputes in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment