Our Services

Our Services

September 23, 2025

Falsely Accused of Shoplifting in South Africa? Know Your Rights Against Unfair Discrimination


Written by Roy Bregman, an admitted attorney with over 51 years of experience in litigation and dispute resolution.

Introduction

On a distressing afternoon, you and your mother visit a local pharmacy, purchase an item, and are then detained by staff in a backroom, accused of theft. Despite your attempts to resolve the situation, which only de-escalated after an external manager intervened, you are left feeling humiliated and profiled. The store’s CEO calls to apologise, promising action, but the formal apology you requested never arrives, and the initial "gaslighting" email from the pharmacy leaves a bitter taste. Now, every time you enter a store, a wave of anxiety hits. This experience, which you believe was racially motivated, was not just a misunderstanding—it was an infringement on your dignity.

If this story resonates with you, know that South African law provides powerful tools to protect you. This article outlines your legal rights when faced with a false accusation of shoplifting, particularly when you suspect unfair discrimination, and explains the practical steps you can take to seek justice.


Falsely Accused of Shoplifting: Unpacking Your Legal Rights

Being wrongly accused of a crime is a deeply violating experience. When that accusation is coupled with the belief that you were targeted because of your race, it strikes at the core of your right to be treated with dignity and equality. Fortunately, South Africa's legal framework offers clear avenues for recourse.

Your Primary Legal Shield: The Equality Act

The cornerstone of your protection is the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act, 2000, commonly known as the Equality Act. This legislation was specifically designed to uphold the constitutional promise of equality.

Its main purposes are to:

  • Prevent and prohibit unfair discrimination, hate speech, and harassment.
  • Promote equality and human dignity for all.
  • Provide accessible and effective remedies for those whose rights have been violated.

The Act explicitly forbids discrimination on "prohibited grounds," which include race, colour, gender, and ethnic or social origin. Discrimination is defined as any act or omission that directly or indirectly imposes burdens, withholds benefits, or disadvantages a person based on one of these grounds.

What Constitutes Unfair Discrimination in a Retail Setting?

Section 7 of the Equality Act specifically addresses unfair discrimination on the grounds of race. This includes actions like providing inferior services to a certain racial group or denying access to opportunities and services.

In your situation, being detained, accused without sufficient proof, and treated with suspicion could be seen as imposing a "burden" and "disadvantage" based on perceived race. The law is clear: neither the state nor any private person or entity, including a retail store, may unfairly discriminate against anyone. If it can be shown that the store's actions were influenced by your race—a concept known as prima facie evidence—the legal burden shifts to the store to prove that their actions were not discriminatory or were, for some reason, fair.

Avenues for Seeking Justice

If you have been a victim of unfair discrimination, you are not powerless. The law provides several formal channels to hold the responsible parties accountable.

1. The Equality Court

This is often the most effective forum for these matters. Equality Courts are established at magistrates' courts and are designed to be accessible, even without a lawyer. They have broad powers to order remedies that fit the situation. For a case like yours, the court can order:

  • A formal, unconditional apology.
  • Payment of damages for financial loss, impairment of dignity, and emotional or psychological suffering. Your ongoing anxiety when entering stores is a direct form of psychological harm that can be quantified.
  • An order to stop the discriminatory practices, which could include mandating specific staff training on how to handle customers without prejudice.
  • An audit of the store's policies and practices to prevent future incidents.

2. The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC)

You can also file a complaint with the SAHRC. This independent body investigates human rights violations and can assist you by investigating your complaint, facilitating a resolution, or even supporting your case in the Equality Court.

3. Criminal Charges via the Hate Crimes Act

If the incident involved a criminal act, such as wrongful detention (unlawful deprivation of liberty), and was motivated by prejudice, it may fall under the Prevention and Combating of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Act. Reporting the matter to the South African Police Service (SAPS) allows for a criminal investigation. It is crucial to state your belief that the act was racially motivated so it can be recorded as a potential hate crime.

Conclusion: You Have a Strong Case to Pursue

Based on your account, you have a compelling case. You were detained, accused of stealing an item you had paid for, and have suffered ongoing psychological harm. The CEO's verbal apology, while an admission of fault, does not absolve the company of its responsibility to provide a formal, written apology and take concrete remedial action. The fact that you feel you were racially profiled is the critical element that brings this matter squarely within the scope of the Equality Act.

Document all evidence, including your email correspondence, proof of the CEO’s call, and a record of the psychological impact this has had on you. With this evidence, you are well-positioned to approach the Equality Court or the SAHRC to seek the justice and resolution you deserve.

 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Do I need a lawyer to go to the Equality Court?
No, the Equality Court process is designed to be accessible to individuals without legal representation. The clerks of the court can assist you in filing your complaint. However, if your case is complex or you are claiming significant damages, consulting an attorney is highly recommended.

Q2: What kind of evidence should I collect if I'm falsely accused of shoplifting?
Preserve everything. This includes the receipt for your purchase, any correspondence with the store (like emails), screenshots of phone calls from management, and names of employees or witnesses. If you suffer from anxiety or other psychological effects, a report from a doctor or psychologist is powerful evidence.

Q3: Is a verbal apology from the CEO enough?
While a verbal apology is an acknowledgment of wrongdoing, it does not prevent you from pursuing further legal action. You are still entitled to seek remedies like a formal written apology and damages for the harm done to your dignity through the Equality Court.

Q4: How long do I have to file a complaint for unfair discrimination?
It is always best to act as soon as possible while the evidence and your memory of the events are fresh. While the Equality Act does not specify a strict prescription period in the same way as other civil claims, delaying too long could potentially weaken your case.

 

No comments: