Ex sues over loss of wife

Randburg businessman Enrico Bernert is suing his former wife's boss for R1m, claiming that the man wooed her away from him. In papers before the Pretoria High Court, Bernert says Albert Kopp, a Sandton businessman, ‘enticed’ his then wife Monika into an adulterous relationship, reports The Star. She subsequently divorced Bernert and married Kopp. He stated that she failed to support him through hard times and refused to move with him to the United Arab Emirates when he obtained employment there. But Monika Kopp said in an answering affidavit that life had become impossible with her former husband and that he had spent most of their married life partying with his bachelor friends. She said Bernert was only too happy when she told him she was going to divorce him.
Full report in The Star

 

Supplied courtesy of Legalbrief Today.

 

Divorced father not liable for school fees

The Cape High Court has ruled that only the parent who was awarded custody and control of a minor child by the court in a divorce case can legally be held accountable for the child's school fees. The ruling, reports Beeld, will affect thousands of divorced couples. In the case, the governing body of Gene Louw Primary School unsuccessfully sued a father, who does not have custody of the child, for outstanding school fees. However, the judge made it clear that divorced parents who do not have custody of their minor children, but who undertook in a divorce settlement agreement or reached an agreement with the schools to pay their children's school fees, would still be liable to pay their share.
Full Beeld report

 

Supplied courtesy of Legalbrief Today.

 

Appeal against sentence in sexual abuse case allowed

The Pretoria High Court yesterday granted the State leave to appeal against the ‘lenient’ sentence imposed on a former SA Air Force colonel who sexually abused his stepdaughter. In November last year Magistrate Len Kotze sentenced the man to three years’ correctional supervision and house arrest after convicting him of three charges of indecent assault and one of incest, reports The Mercury. Yesterday, Judge Chris Botha granted the State leave to appeal against the sentence. The Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions, Retha Meintjes, said in court papers that the grounds of appeal included that the magistrate had played down the gravity of the offence and the impact it had had on the victim. The Mercury report not available online    Supplied courtesy of Legalbrief Today.

 

Women's groups seek tough stand on violent crime

In the face of government moves towards lighter sentences to alleviate prison overcrowding, the Consortium on Violence Against Women has called for continued heavy sentences for serious crimes, especially those against women. It says that even if there is proof that minimum sentences contribute to the overpopulation of SA prisons, this is no reason to impose lighter sentences for serious crimes. According to a report in Die Burger, it listed factors that should not be taken into account for mitigation when an offender was being sentenced as: the victim's sexual experience; the offender's cultural beliefs about r ape; the offender's alcohol and substance abuse; the offender's lack of education and bad background; and the victim's seeming lack of physical or emotional damage. Full report on the News24 site    Supplied courtesy of Legalbrief Today.

 

Unmarried survivor cannot claim maintenance - ConCourt

A woman, who wanted to claim maintenance after the death of her life partner, was refused remedy by the Constitutional Court, which, in a majority decision, ruled that Ethel Robinson, who was not married to her partner Aaron Shandling when he died in 2001, did not have the legal right to financial support from Shandling's estate. A report on the IoL site says the court recognised that many women become economically dependent on men, and could be left destitute on the death of their male partners, but said these wrongs would not be put right by including unmarried partners in the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act. The MSS Act gives rights to survivors of a marriage, but defines a survivor as ‘the surviving spouse in a marriage dissolved by death’. Robinson, represented by the Women's Legal Centre (WLC), contended that the Act was in conflict with the Constitution, because it unfairly discriminated against domestic partners. Robinson and Shandling had been involved in a monogamous life partnership for 15 years. Justice Skweyiya, who wrote the judgment, said changing the wording of the Act would be a ‘palliative measure’. He said the vulnerability of women in domestic relationships was a widespread problem that should be addressed through the empowerment of women. The judgment also noted the need to improve the law to put more general rights and obligations on people who live in domestic relationships. Full report on the IoL site Noting that the ruling has adverse implications for women in domestic life partnerships, the WLC’s Director, Michelle O’Sullivan, says: ‘The majority decision seems to suggest that the economic and social problems faced by women in domestic partnerships are so widespread that the limited assistance available to them through claiming maintenance from their partners deceased estate is unlikely to alleviate the level of vulnerability that they experience.’ O’Sullivan adds in a statement on the Legalbrief Today site that Judge Skweyiya also suggests that it is only once relationships are recognised by legislation during the subsistence of the relationship that the court could meaningfully consider what should happen upon the death of a partner to that relationship. ’It is strange that when faced with the opportunity to diminish the vulnerability of women at the end of a domestic partnership, the Constitutional Court relies on the severity of the vulnerability of women in the group concerned in order to justify refusing an extension of benefits to women in domestic partnerships.’ However, the statement finds light in the dissenting judgments of Justice Mokgoro and O’Regan, the two women on the Court, and the dissent by Justice Sachs. They found there was a constitutional violation and would have given the legislature two years to remedy the violation. Full WLC statement on the Legalbrief Today site General: ANC attacks on judiciary ‘manipulative’ – Leon As the debate on racism in the judiciary simmers behind closed doors, DA leader Tony Leon has accused government of seeking to manipulate the debate to ensure a more docile judiciary, says a Business Day report. Government is smarting from a series of recent losses in court, including defeated proposals on new medicine pricing, its overturned decision to allow the construction of a pebble bed modular reactor, and the thwarting of its decision that the Mikro Primary School teach learners in English and Afrikaans. The report says Leon accused the ANC of seeking to ‘intimidate the judiciary’, using the debate around racism on the Bench. ‘Stung by its defeat at the Supreme Court of Appeal in the pharmaceutical pricing case late last year, and looking ahead to a number of critical judicial decisions in the next few months, the ANC has launched a well-planned series of attacks on the independence of the SA judiciary,’ he said. Full report in Business Day    Supplied courtesy of Legalbrief Today.